Mahsa

But, it is not a problem at all from the view of human proficients. The causality claims that man marriage is neither culturally nor physiologically workable and it is a dead-end street without the cooperation of a leash party due to extinction of generation. He satirized that queer marriage is not programmed properly and in that location are hardware problems as well in cyber language. He explores the question of whether quirkiness is an immutable characteristic be example there is no evidence for the claim that homo bring upuality Is genetic, hormonal or biological from all school of medicine, aesculapian Journal or master copy organization.He comments that transvestites are the richest, close to educated and most traveled demographic throng although they are few in number. He believes that homosexuality is a behavior-based life style and presents the 1986 Supreme Court ending of Bowers vs.. Hardwire case for claim that gay marriage is states open school curricu lum and homosexual marriage should be taught to their children as abnormally. To reinforce his views, he insists that churches may stand up homosexual weddings and it may be utilize as a basis for denying them access to all kinds of political sympathies programs.And, Catholic churches were singled out by the metropolis and denied assist for providing emergency shelter to the city roofless for foe against homosexual powerfuls ordinances. Sheldon asserts that homosexual marriage is an oxymoron, unnatural and against our unsophisticated most basic standards. Finally, he reports that every honored public opinion poll demonstrates that nearly 8 of every 10 Americans dont accept the pretence of homosexual marriage. Although homosexual marriage is not generational, his claim is shockable view about marriage. The meaning of marriage is not limited on only preserving our species.Everyone has a right to pursue ones happiness through living with a person whom one loved. Also, all ma nkind has the right to pursue ones civil liberties. The only action that should be banned from doing is the action that causes harm on individual else, but homosexual marriage does not cause harm in m each cases. We need to dispense that we could not predicate homosexual to be behavior-based life-style Just because there is no recognition from any school of medicine, medical journal or professional organization that homosexuality is genetic, hormonal or biological.A equivocal picture of this article is that homosexuals are the richest, cost educated and most traveled demographic group. The author should run evidence to support his views. Another questionable aspect of this article is that homosexuality is not a constitutionally protected right. Homosexuals are the citizens of the United States who phototypesettings a citizen. Theyve taxes, adapt laws, vote and educate themselves, etc. So, their right should be guaranteed discriminated. According to the article 2 of Universal c ontract of Human Rights, everyone is entitled to all the rights and freedoms set forrader in this Declaration.This indicates that being homosexual should not encumbrance on possessing the right of marriage and having family. His claim has no bases why homosexuality should be taught to children as the abnormally and why churches stopped supporting for providing emergency shelter to city homeless. He looks like worrying that admitting same sex marriage will make homosexuality as kind of a trend and will be spread over peck. And, it is questionable why churches used homeless people as sacrifices to against homosexuality. I could not find any relationship between homosexuals and homeless people.In a final shortcoming in the article, the author claims that homosexual marriage is against our country most basic standard. He should explain in detail what standards are and how homosexual marriage is against those. Despite these criticism, the authors claim should not be criticized as a wi tch hunting. People against homosexuality and people supportive homosexuality Just have divers(prenominal) opinions. In my view, more systematic and comprehensive enquiry of this issue is needed including the countries which legalized same-sex marriage before any firm conclusion can be drawn.